SPRINGFIELD — The City Council on Monday approved spending $450,000 to resolve a police brutality case in which a jury previously ruled the city was “deliberately indifferent to the civil rights of its citizens.”
The payment to Lee Hutchins Sr. follows a successful lawsuit in U.S. District Court in which he accused police of using excessive force during a domestic disturbance. The Boston jury awarded $250,000 to Hutchins in February, and he filed a subsequent claim for more than $200,000 in attorneys’ fees and trial-related costs.
Federal jury awards $250,000 in Springfield police brutality case
Attorney Luke Ryan said the U.S. District Court jury found that Officer Thomasa Hervieux, one of three officers named in the complaint, was the only one who used excessive force.
Springfield City Solicitor Edward Pikula said the settlement was negotiated after the judgment. The city faced a potential payment of $600,000 when considering the judgment, interest on the judgment, attorney fees and other costs.
The suit was initially filed in U.S. District Court in Springfield, but was transferred to Boston.
The Springfield City Council recently met in private with the Law Department to discuss the proposed settlement, but did not discuss the specifics in public until Monday. Funds for the settlement were transferred from the city’s fiscal 2018 budget surplus, known as its “free cash” account.
Hutchins claimed three officers used excessive force again him when he was pepper sprayed and struck with a baton at his home on Jan. 20, 2013.
The jury found one officer, Thomas Hervieux, used excessive force. The verdict slip from the jury said the city “was deliberately indifferent to the civil rights of its citizens through a policy or custom of inadequately supervising or disciplining its police officers.”
Lawyers for Hutchins said the city was to blame for the rising cost of the lawsuit by dragging out the case rather than reaching a settlement. They said the prolonged case led to more than 500 hours of work on Hutchins’ behalf.
“In short, the City never made any serious effort to resolve the litigation,” wrote Northampton attorney Luke Ryan, one of the lawyers representing Hutchins.
Councilors have been critical of police misconduct lawsuits and city funds needed to settle them.
Council President Justin Hurst, in previously commenting on the judgment, said, “Unfortunately, this case is just the tip of the iceberg that last year cost taxpayers over a million dollars in settlements, and if this case is any indication, citizens will be paying even more money this year.”
The vote was 10-2 in favor of the settlement, with Councilors Orlando Ramos and Adam Gomez opposed, and Councilor Tracye Whitfield absent.
Pikula said judgments must be paid if not successfully appealed or settled.
On Oct. 1, 2018, the City Council approved a settlement of $885,000 to four men who claimed they were beaten by off-duty police officers in 2015 outside Nathan Bill’s Bar & Restaurant. Of that amount, $750,000 was awarded to Herman Paul Cumby, who suffered a concussion, fractured ankle and damaged teeth in the attack, according to a lawsuit he filed against the city.
In April, 13 current and former Springfield police officers were arraigned in Hampden Superior Court on allegations that they either participated in or helped cover up the beating.
BOSTON (AP) — A federal jury has awarded $250,000 to a Massachusetts man who said Springfield police used excessive force when they responded to his home for reports of a domestic disturbance.
Lawyers for Lee Hutchins Sr. told Masslive.com that the jury found Wednesday that one of the three responding officers used excessive force and the other two unlawfully entered Hutchins’ home in January 2015.
Hutchins said in the suit that police pepper-sprayed his eyes and beat him with batons while he was trying to defuse a domestic melee.
The jury also found that “the city of Springfield had a custom of failing to discipline officers and this custom demonstrated deliberate indifference to the rights” of citizens.
A city lawyer said Springfield is “reviewing all of its options for post-trial motions and appeals.”
BOSTON — Opening statements were held Tuesday in U.S. District Court here in a lawsuit alleging police brutality filed against three Springfield police officers and the city of Springfield.
Lee Hutchins of Springfield sued officers Daniel J. McKay, Felix Romero and Thomas Hervieux, alleging the three used excessive force against him on Jan. 20, 2013.
Hutchins claimed police pepper-sprayed his eyes and beat him with batons while he was trying to defuse a domestic melee.
The disturbance involved Hutchins’ two adult sons, Lee Jr. and Keith Hutchins, who were living at his home, according to the complaint. Just after midnight, the mother of Lee Hutchins Jr.’s 2-year-old arrived at the house, demanding to take the child back, the court record states.
“During the ensuing altercation, Hutchins attempted to assist the police in taking his two sons in custody in the hopes this would de-escalate the situation,” the complaint said.
McKay pepper-sprayed Hutchins in the face, according to the complaint. The use of pepper spray on Hutchins was “unjustified” and caused him pain and temporary blindness, said his lawyer, Luke Ryan.
The complaint added that Hervieux unnecessarily thumped Hutchins with a police baton.
“Despite the fact that plaintiff was suffering the effects of the pepper spray and posed no threat to any of the officers, defendant Hervieux struck plaintiff twice with his baton, knocking plaintiff to the ground,” it states.
Hutchins alleges McKay drafted a police report which resulted in charges against him for disorderly conduct, assault and battery on a police officer and resisting arrest. The suit says McKay falsified the allegations.
According to the suit, Hutchins was acquitted of all charges after a Springfield District Court trial.
Other allegations in the suit are: unlawful entry, false arrest, failure to discipline and train officers, assault and battery (against McKay and Hervieux), false arrest and imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process.
Hutchins is seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, interest and costs of the suit, attorneys’ fees and any other relief the court deems “just and proper.”
In an answer to the complaint filed in court records on behalf of the three officers, lawyer Kevin B. Coyle said the defendants denied the excessive force and other allegations. Coyle said the court lacks jurisdiction, the officers are entitled to immunity to the claims, and the complaint was filed late.
SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) – A police officer has been suspended after pleading not guilty in Springfield District Court on Thursday, to nine criminal charges including assault and battery causing serious bodily injury, and conspiracy.
According to State Attorney General Maura Healey’s Office, 54-year old Jose Diaz was released without bail after pleading not guilty at his arraignment.
Diaz is facing four counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, one count of assault and battery causing serious bodily injury, three counts of assault and battery and one conspiracy charge.
The Hampden County District Attorney’s office declined to file any criminal charges in February of last year, saying the charges would depend on a positive identification of the assailant or assailants, and “no such identification has been made”. But the State Attorney General’s office brought the charges against Diaz and said this is an active and ongoing investigation.
Springfield Police Spokesman Ryan Walsh told 22News Diaz was been suspended without pay for five days, and will be placed on administrative leave. In a statement, Walsh said, “this is very troubling, as our police officers are sworn to enforce our laws, not break them.”
In a statement to 22News, Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno said:
Again this is very troubling, as our police officers are sworn to enforce our laws, not break them. Any officer that breaches the public trust should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law – ‘let the chips fall where they may’. From the beginning of this incident Commissioner Barbieri, City Solicitor Ed Pikula, Labor Relations Director Bill Mahoney and I have worked with all outside authorities to pursue this case, even bringing in independent counsel and retired Judge Bertha Josephson to hear this case before our citizens Community Police Hearing Board (CPHB). This reflects unfairly on the vast majority of our brave and dedicated police officers, who put their lives on the line protecting our citizens, day in and day out. Whether on-duty or off-duty our police officers must wear their badge not only with courage but just as important with honor, integrity, and professionalism. The reform efforts initiated by Commissioner Barbieri are ongoing and will continue in order to maintain the public’s faith and trust.
“I feel like Springfield cops have been pretty good as far as not getting in trouble, but people are people,” said Edward Gearing, a Springfield resident. “There’s always one or two bad apples. Always”
A conviction on even just one of the most serious of these charges in district court could result in a maximum of two and a half years in jail.
The State Attorney General’s office and the FBI are still investigating the incident.
SPRINGFIELD — As surveillance cameras rolled in a police station holding cell, a Springfield narcotics detective declared he could get away with anything — even murder.
“I could crush your [expletive] skull and [expletive] get away with it,” Officer Gregg Bigda told a 15-year-old suspect in the theft of an unmarked police SUV.
Questioning another teen suspect, Bigda, the police video shows, raised his soiled boot and claimed it was flecked with the blood of the boy’s friend. He pointed to his other boot — “That’ll be yours on this shoe.”
It was a shocking assertion from an officer who has long been accused by citizens of pushing the limits of the laws he swore to uphold. Yet, within the Springfield Police Department, Bigda appears, in his extreme and disturbing behavior, far from an isolated case.
For years, claims of police misconduct — ranging from false reports, brutal beatings, and wrongful convictions — have been lodged against Springfield officers in courtrooms, in the community, and even from within the ranks.
The city has paid millions to settle claims, while civil suits filed against the police department allege many officers accused of serious misconduct have faced little to no discipline, though Bigda was suspended. Some of them have been promoted, records show.
Now, the US Department of Justice is conducting two investigations — one a criminal probe by the FBI focused on Bigda’s actions and the other a sweeping civil review of whether the police department’s narcotics unit routinely used excessive force and violated people’s civil rights.
The FBI and state attorney general’s office are also looking into a 2015 melee outside a bar on Springfield’s Island Pond Road, where four black men allege they were beaten by off-duty officers.
“What Springfield has demonstrated through these patterns of violations is that the police are not able to police themselves,” said Sophia Hall, a staff attorney at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Justice in Boston. “Basically, in the absence of any sort of accountability. . . DOJ steps in.”
The investigations come at a critical time in the life of the state’s third-largest city. A decade after Springfield emerged from state receivership due to financial woes, officials beckon visitors to gamble in a glimmering new $960 million casino downtown. City leaders hope the new venue and the thousands it will attract will lift the city’s economy and public image, but the federal investigations could result in more black eyes and costly reforms for the city of 154,000.
It is the first Massachusetts police department to come under investigation by the Justice Department’s civil rights division, putting it in a class with cities like Ferguson, Mo., Baltimore, and Chicago, where police abuses triggered rare federal intervention.
In dozens of federal civil rights lawsuits reviewed by the Globe, Springfield officers are portrayed by plaintiffs as acting above the law and inoculated from punishment.
Seven narcotics officers amassed about 133 complaints for alleged infractions that ranged from beating prisoners to using racial slurs to roughing up a fellow narcotics officer on a federal task force, according to police department records included in a civil suit settled last year. Only one of those officers — arrested for drunken driving in Indiana — was ever suspended, records show.
Since 2006, the city has settled 25 police misconduct lawsuits and was ordered to pay judgments in two other cases, costing taxpayers nearly $4 million.
Bishop Talbert Swan II, president of the Greater Springfield chapter of the NAACP, said city leaders have resisted efforts to reform the department, opting instead to dismiss complaints and marginalize people who speak out.
“Those at the top really don’t have the intestinal fortitude to spearhead an effort toward real systemic change,” Swan said. “We have a saying in the church: In order to fix it you have to face it. If they’re not willing to face it, they’ll never fix it.”
Mayor Domenic J. Sarno and Police Commissioner John Barbieri declined interview requests. Sarno has previously said the city would work with federal investigators.
City Solicitor Edward Pikula said the investigation “signals everyone will be held accountable and it signals that [Springfield’s] government is willing to work with other agencies to improve the system.” Officers, for example, recently agreed to wear body cameras.
David Holway, president of the National Association of Government Employees, which represents the Springfield patrolmen, said the union is confident “that most of these investigations will prove fruitless.”
Few details have emerged about the ongoing investigations, but the breadth of issues facing the department have surfaced over the last decade, largely in civil court filings.
In one high-profile civil case, a jury found a white officer used excessive force in a 2009 confrontation with a 15-year-old black boy who was struck and killed by a car. The city paid $1 million to the boy’s family. The officer was cleared by police of wrongdoing and later promoted.
Other pending lawsuits allege off-duty officers beat four black men outside a bar in 2015. More recently, there’s the case of Bigda, the detective who boasted he could get away with just about anything.
A shocking videotape
On the evening of Feb. 26, 2016, Bigda allegedly sat at his desk drinking straight rum, according to two civil lawsuits.
A colleague, Officer Steven Vigneault, who filed one of the lawsuits against him, claims he ordered a pizza to help Bigda sober up. When he went to get the meal, Vigneault said he left an unmarked police SUV running outside the pizzeria, and four teens jumped inside and drove off.
Police tracked the SUV to nearby Palmer and detained three teens.
On a residential strip of North Main Street, Bigda allegedly kicked a handcuffed 14-year-old Puerto Rican boy in the face as he lay on the ground, spat on him and said, “Welcome to white town [expletive],” according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday by the teenager’s mother.
Another handcuffed teenager, who was 15 years old, was also kicked in the face by Bigda, the civil suit alleges.
The 14-year-old was hospitalized and officers brought two other teens to the Palmer police station.
Bigda gestured toward a surveillance camera and warned one of the boys he’d be brought to the Springfield police station, where there were no cameras.
“So anything that happens to you at my place, never happened,” Bigda said, his comments recorded by the video system. “If you don’t write it in a report, it never [expletive] happened.”
He told the 15-year-old: “I’ll [expletive] charge you with whatever I want. I’ll stick a [expletive] kilo of coke in your pocket and put you away for [expletive] 15 years.”
Months later, the video of Bigda’s interrogation circulated in Springfield. Defense lawyers used it to discredit him in court in cases in which he was a witness.
Facing a disciplinary hearing, Bigda agreed in August 2016 to serve a 60-day suspension and was transferred out of the narcotics unit. His lawyer didn’t respond to requests for comment.
In April 2017, a federal judge hearing another Springfield police misconduct case said he was shocked by the Bigda tape.
“I’ve seen videos of really violent arrests, and this got to me,” said Judge Michael A. Ponsor, who presided over a now-settled civil suit alleging excessive force by Bigda and colleagues.
Before the Palmer incident, Bigda had weathered 24 internal investigations of misconduct — none of which resulted in discipline, according to the lawsuit filed by the 14-year-old boy’s mother.
Today, he’s assigned to a desk job and earned $90,000 last year, city records show.
Bigda’s former colleague, Vigneault, alleges in his state whistle-blower suit against Bigda and others that he resigned amid fears that he would be falsely accused of kicking one of the teens in Palmer. He is cooperating with the FBI in the Bigda investigation and testified before a federal grand jury in March, according to his lawyer, Shawn Allyn.
“He sees himself as a scapegoat,” Allyn said.
The suit alleges that Bigda drank liquor before drug raids and was intoxicated while questioning the teenagers. Vigneault told the FBI that officers had removed soda from a vending machine in the narcotics unit and replaced it with beer, Allyn said.
The police commissioner, Barbieri, said an internal investigation found no evidence that narcotics officers drank on the job, according to an affidavit filed in court.
Another high-profile case pending in federal court involves an alleged beating and coverup by a group of officers.
Around 11 p.m. on April 7, 2015, Paul Cumby, a lawn sprinkler installer who grew up in Springfield, was drinking with two cousins and a friend at Nathan Bill’s Bar & Restaurant.
Cumby’s cousin, Jozelle Ligon, whistled to the bartender to get her attention. But Daniel Billingsley, an off-duty Springfield police officer at the bar with colleagues, thought Ligon was cat-calling his girlfriend, another off-duty officer, according to Cumby’s lawsuit.
Ligon said he offered to buy Billingsley a drink to clear the air, but he refused.
“We’re police officers, we have a tab, and we don’t want your drinks,” Billingsley told them, according to lawsuits by Cumby and his cousins. Later, words were exchanged outside.
Cumby said he tried to defuse the situation, but when he turned his back to Billingsley, he was struck from behind and knocked out.
When he regained consciousness, Cumby said he had a broken leg, dislocated ankle and four teeth had been knocked loose. His cousins and their friend also reported being beaten.
Two police cruisers and an ambulance arrived and some of the alleged attackers retreated into the bar, Cumby said.
“They [were] in the window laughing,” he said in an interview. “They thought it was funny.”
In July 2015, Cumby met with Springfield police investigators, who asked Cumby to identify the attackers and presented him with more than 2,600 photographs to consider, including one of Billingsley among 658 photos of Springfield officers.
“They flooded him with thousands of images,” said Cumby’s attorney Michelle S. Cruz.
The same thing occurred when Cumby’s cousins met with investigators.
The men couldn’t conclusively identify their attackers from the vast photo array. In February 2017, Hampden District Attorney Anthony Gulluni declined to press charges because no one could positively identify an assailant.
“I kind of expected it,” said Cumby. “You live here for a long time you get to understand that there’s not much you can do here because everything’s for the cops. Sometimes they get in trouble. Most of the time, they get away with everything.”
Billingsley’s attorney did not respond to requests for comment.
To date, no disciplinary hearings have been held for any of the officers believed to have been at the bar on the night of the attack, Cruz said. One officer named in lawsuits filed after the incident was promoted in July to sergeant.
In April, the FBI and state AG’s office asked for the public’s help in identifying a man who may have witnessed the confrontation.
‘They’ve lost their trust’
One of the largest payouts by Springfield for police misconduct came in a 2014 settlement with the family of 15-year-old Delano M. Walker Jr.
On a July night in 2009, Walker was on his phone talking to his girlfriend, walking alongside two friends on bicycles.
Two Springfield police officers, investigating car break-ins, stopped the teens. Officer Sean Sullivan ordered Walker to get off the phone, but Walker refused. Sullivan lunged for his throat, according to testimony in a federal civil suit.
The teenager backed away, into the path of an oncoming car that struck and killed him. Police cleared Sullivan of any wrongdoing.
However, a federal jury found Sullivan violated Walker’s civil rights and awarded $1.26 million to his mother, Kissa Owens. The city settled the case for $1 million.
In July, Sullivan was promoted to sergeant.
“I was shocked,” said Owens, 41, of Springfield, who believed Sullivan should have been fired. “Delano won’t get another birthday.”
Owens said she’s upset that neither the mayor nor police have apologized to her.
“He was a 15-year-old kid and no one has ever said I’m sorry” Owens said. “Why can’t you say, ‘I messed up. I’m sorry.’”
Sullivan’s attorney, Kevin B. Coyle, said his client’s actions were “totally appropriate and he didn’t deserve any discipline.”
Justin Hurst, an at-large city councilor in Springfield, said the police department has faced so many controversies that some residents are resigned to the status quo.
“People are starting to become desensitized. Part of that is a result of people not being held accountable,” he said.”It’s very obvious that they’ve lost their trust.”
That accountability may come at the behest of the federal government.
Emily Gunston, a former Justice Department official, said investigators in the past have focused on departments that appeared to be “among the worst of the worst” in the country.
“It’s really looking at a pattern or practice of violations of the constitution or federal law,” said Gunston, now deputy legal director at the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs.
If violations are found, the government could mandate major reforms.
Some agreements in other cities subject to justice department scrutiny have cost communities millions of dollars to pay for training, equipment, and outside experts to oversee the changes.
“It’s very frustrating to see these officers that have violated other people’s civil rights not only keep their jobs, but be promoted,” Springfield City Council President Orlando Ramos said. “Residents should be able to trust officers who are sworn to protect and serve us.”
Posted: Feb 28, 2017 3:55 PM EDT Updated: Mar 21, 2017 3:55 PM EST
SPRINGFIELD – Illinois State Police say a Springfield Police officer was arrested following an investigation into an altercation that happened on February 27.
Springfield Police say the officer is 32-year-old Samuel Rosario, who has been on the force for two years.
ISP officials say they were called by Springfield Police to investigate an altercation between an on-duty Rosario and a 19-year-old man Monday night. According to the preliminary investigation into the incident, the officer was dispatched to a home to investigate a domestic disturbance. Authorities say a 19-year-old male, who is not the suspect in the domestic disturbance call, became upset, leading to a verbal altercation and eventually a physical confrontation between Officer Rosario and the man.
Illinois State Police say the incident was captured on Rosario’s body camera, as well as another officer’s body camera. The 19-year-old was not arrested during or after the course of this incident. ISP investigators reviewed the video provided by the Springfield Police Department, and after consulting with the Sangamon County State’s Attorney’s Office, arrested the officer Tuesday morning on preliminary charges of battery and official misconduct.
Rosario is currently on unpaid administrative leave as the investigation into this incident continues.